NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 68% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 5.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 1516
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 172
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 6325
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 28.91
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 312.94
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 1.83
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 27.833
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 103.937
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 2486
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3587
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 2486
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3587
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 28 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 27.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 585 versus 305
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 1516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 6325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 28.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 312.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 27.833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 103.937 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 585 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Nom de code | TU107 | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 28 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 1071 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 993 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 954 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |