NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 6332
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 20732
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 75.758
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 843.503
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 5.071
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 24.676
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 301.168
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 564

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 650
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 305

Compare specifications (specs)