NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 1142.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7 GB/s
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 6332
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 20732
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 75.758
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 843.503
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 5.071
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 24.676
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 301.168
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3336
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 8496
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 25 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 versus 564
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 versus 564 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU107 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 25 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $139 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 487 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,138 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |