NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1333.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 vs 5345
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 537
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 15511
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 vs 41.613
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 vs 971.208
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 vs 4.281
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 vs 40.404
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 vs 86.208
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 7038
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3686
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 7038
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3686

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

• 6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1839 vs 305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7881 5345
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	564 537
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39165 15511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.765 41.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1316.075 971.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.799 4.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.915 40.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	573.418 86.208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	305 1839

Compare specifications (specs)