NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1178 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39418 vs 27020
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 vs 105.107
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 vs 1225.96
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 vs 35.714
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 vs 489.884
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3340
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9646 vs 7878
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 577
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 10959
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 10959
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3622 vs 3598

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7878 9646
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	577 773
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	39418 27020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	134.955 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1294.279 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.756 8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.78 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	569.916 489.884
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10959 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3598 3622

Compare specifications (specs)