NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 850.1x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 vs 9363
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 114.288
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 10.947
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 683.568
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 11675
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 11675
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 vs 9363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 vs 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 vs 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 vs 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 vs 804
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 2548.187
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 117.673
- 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 vs 1278
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 1408 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 vs 804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 vs 117.673 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 vs 1278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 9363 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | Grenada |
| Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $429 |
| Place in performance rating | 223 | 269 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 275 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRyzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
