NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 70% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12712 versus 9363
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 114.288
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 10.947
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 683.568
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 11675
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 11675
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 versus 9363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1408
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 804
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 2548.187
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 117.673
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4242 versus 1278
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 117.673 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 versus 1278 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 9363 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Grenada |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $429 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 223 | 269 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 44 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 275 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 512 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRyzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
