NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and ATI Radeon HD 4810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 625 MHz
• 6410x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8608 vs 769

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4810

• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4810

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8608 769
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 425

Compare specifications (specs)