NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 1324.4x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52065 vs 34276
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2019 vs 21 February 2018
Texture fill rate 128.2 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 1280
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 52065 vs 34276

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1140 MHz
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1335 MHz
  • 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8793 vs 8606
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 363
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 12301
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 12301
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1328 MHz vs 1140 MHz
Boost clock speed 1476 MHz vs 1335 MHz
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8793 vs 8606
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 vs 363
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12948 vs 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12948 vs 12301

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8606
8793
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
363
456
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
52065
34276
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12301
12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12301
12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3358
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 8606 8793
PassMark - G2D Mark 363 456
Geekbench - OpenCL 52065 34276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 492.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12301 12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12301 12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4918 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU116 GP104
Launch date 23 April 2019 21 February 2018
Place in performance rating 338 336
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1335 MHz 1476 MHz
Core clock speed 1140 MHz 1328 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1536 1280
Pixel fill rate 64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 128.2 GTexel/s 96.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 6600 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 3,098 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 168.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 7012 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5