NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52065 vs 39684
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 116.142
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1022.932
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 9.235
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 84.034
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 11281
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3695
- Around 13% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4918 vs 4362
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52065 vs 39684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 vs 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 vs 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 vs 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 vs 84.034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4918 vs 4362 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8856 vs 8604
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 363
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 492.867
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8856 vs 8604 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 363 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 492.867 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8604 | 8856 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52065 | 39684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4918 | 4362 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 338 | 339 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |