NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
• Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 52065
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 195.93
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2046.214 vs 1919.95
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 14.6
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 645.647 vs 492.867

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 600 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1215 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8589 vs 8279
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 362 vs 340
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 10140
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 10140

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8279 8589
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	340 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	68305 52065
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.867 195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2046.214 1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.026 14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.532 94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	645.647 492.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10140 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10140 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3358

Compare specifications (specs)