NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 959.6x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 8160
• Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 31098
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 111.55
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 1371.266
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 8.49
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 19.803
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3654
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3654
• Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 vs 3677

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1140 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 360
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 492.867
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 12301
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 12301

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8609 8160
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	360 444
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52263 31098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4903 3677

Compare specifications (specs)