NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FireStream 9270

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 4273.3x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s
• Around 92% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 800
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 1341

Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270

• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 vs 360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8609 1341
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	360 473

Compare specifications (specs)