NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 988 MHz
- Environ 60% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1114 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 versus 724
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57884 versus 39545
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 versus 12.895
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 768.171
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 13738
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 13738
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 21 March 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 988 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1114 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 versus 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57884 versus 39545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 versus 12.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 768.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11749 versus 11678
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 versus 189.842
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 versus 1902.867
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 versus 116.183
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11749 versus 11678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 versus 189.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 versus 1902.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 versus 116.183 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11678 | 11749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 | 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57884 | 39545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 207.14 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 2593.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 12.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 145.003 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 768.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | GM200 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 21 March 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $4,199.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 251 | 253 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $2,825 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 988 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 8,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 6,844 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 213.9 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 6612 MHz |
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 317.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |