NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V8700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and ATI FirePro V8700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 41.5 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 41.5 GTexel / s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8700
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 576 MHz
- 3.7x more pipelines: 800 vs 216
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 536.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 182 Watt
- Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 896 MB
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1998 MHz
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 576 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 216 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 536.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 896 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 1998 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8700
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | ATI FirePro V8700 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8543 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 152.6 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1539 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | ATI FirePro V8700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GT200 | RV770 |
Launch date | 16 September 2008 | 11 September 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 433 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 536.5 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 216 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 41.5 GTexel / s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 254 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1998 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |