NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 33.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 288 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 2016 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Texture fill rate | 33.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops vs 288 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2016 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 518 MHz
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 182 Watt
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 518 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 44 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1963 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3259 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3259 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G92 |
Launch date | 8 December 2009 | 1 December 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1262 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $49.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.55 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 518 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 288 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 33.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.9 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2016 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PowerMizer 8.0 |