NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 33.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
  • Around 44% better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 288 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 1 GB
  • Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 2016 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Texture fill rate 33.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 96
Floating-point performance 414.7 gflops vs 288 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1792 MB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 2016 MHz vs 2000 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 518 MHz
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 182 Watt
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 518 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 182 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
PassMark - G3D Mark 418
PassMark - G2D Mark 44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3259
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3259

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla
Code name GT200B G92
Launch date 8 December 2009 1 December 2009
Place in performance rating not rated 1262
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Price now $49.95
Value for money (0-100) 22.55

Technical info

Core clock speed 518 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 414.7 gflops 288 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 192 96
Texture fill rate 33.2 GTexel / s 28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 182 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,400 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x S-Video No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.3 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.9 GB / s 64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 448 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2016 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM with others

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP NVIDIA
Quadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M NVIDIA
Quadro FX 2800M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
vs ATI Radeon HD 4520 ATI
Radeon HD 4520