NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 33.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 192 vs 16
- 9.4x better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 44 gflops
- 3.5x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 2016 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Texture fill rate | 33.2 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops vs 44 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2016 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 518 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 182 Watt
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 518 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 182 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 123 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1023 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1023 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT200B | GT218 |
Launch date | 8 December 2009 | 1 December 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1600 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 518 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops | 44 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 33.2 GTexel / s | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.9 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2016 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |