NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 4.75 GTexel / s
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 308 gflops vs 142.56 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 381 vs 110
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 594 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 4.75 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops vs 142.56 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 vs 110 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 120 vs 112
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 137 vs 41
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 120 vs 112 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 137 vs 41 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 110 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92 | RV630 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1457 | 1192 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 594 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops | 142.56 gflops |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 120 |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec | 4.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 12.67 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 792 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |