NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 750 MHz
- Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 41 vs 35
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 vs 35 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- 2.9x more pipelines: 320 vs 112
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 308 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3085
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3085
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 308 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 382 vs 381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3285 vs 3085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3285 vs 3085 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 381 | 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 41 | 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 | 3285 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
| Code name | G92 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 10 September 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1457 | 1459 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 308 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 462 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 112 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Length | 193 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||