NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 750 MHz
  • Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 43 vs 37
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 March 2009 vs 10 September 2008
Core clock speed 1375 MHz vs 750 MHz
Texture fill rate 31 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 43 vs 37

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670

  • 2.9x more pipelines: 320 vs 112
  • Around 56% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 308 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3085
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3085
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 320 vs 112
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 308 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 59 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3285 vs 3085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3285 vs 3085

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
379
379
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
43
37
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3085
3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3085
3285
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M ATI Radeon HD 4670
PassMark - G3D Mark 379 379
PassMark - G2D Mark 43 37
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3085 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3085 3285

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M ATI Radeon HD 4670

Essentials

Architecture Tesla TeraScale
Code name G92 RV730
Launch date 3 March 2009 10 September 2008
Place in performance rating 1449 1450
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $67

Technical info

Core clock speed 1375 MHz 750 MHz
CUDA cores 112
Floating-point performance 308 gflops 480.0 gflops
Gigaflops 462
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 112 320
Texture fill rate 31 billion / sec 24 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 59 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 514 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way
Length 193 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.1
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 61 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
PureVideo HD