NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 550 MHz
  • Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
  • 7x more pipelines: 112 vs 2x 8
  • 6.9x better floating-point performance: 308 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 379 vs 103
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 658
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 658
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 March 2009 vs 20 January 2009
Core clock speed 1375 MHz vs 550 MHz
Texture fill rate 31 billion / sec vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Pipelines 112 vs 2x 8
Floating-point performance 308 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 379 vs 103
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3085 vs 658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3085 vs 658

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

  • Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 143 vs 43
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 143 vs 43

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
379
103
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
43
143
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3085
658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3085
658
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark 379 103
PassMark - G2D Mark 43 143
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3085 658
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3085 658

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92 G98
Launch date 3 March 2009 20 January 2009
Place in performance rating 1452 1453
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $131.43
Price now $80.99
Value for money (0-100) 1.61

Technical info

Core clock speed 1375 MHz 550 MHz
CUDA cores 112
Floating-point performance 308 gflops 2x 22.4 gflops
Gigaflops 462
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 112 2x 8
Texture fill rate 31 billion / sec 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 210 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI No outputs
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2x 256 MB
Memory bandwidth 61 GB / s 2x 11.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 2x 64 Bit
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
PureVideo HD