NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- 7x more pipelines: 112 vs 2x 8
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 308 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 379 vs 103
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 658
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 658
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 20 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 112 vs 2x 8 |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 vs 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 143 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 143 vs 43 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 | 103 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 43 | 143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 | 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92 | G98 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1452 | 1453 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops | 2x 22.4 gflops |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |