NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NVS 2100M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 2100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 3 March 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1375 MHz vs 535 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 31 billion / sec vs 4.28 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 112 vs 16
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 308 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 379 vs 140
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3085 vs 1249
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3085 vs 1249
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1375 MHz vs 535 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 billion / sec vs 4.28 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 308 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 379 vs 140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3085 vs 1249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3085 vs 1249 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 2100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 140 | 379 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 152 | 43 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1249 | 3085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1249 | 3085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NVS 2100M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G92 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1450 | 1451 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 535 MHz | 1375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 308 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 4.28 GTexel / s | 31 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 462 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD |