NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.9x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 7x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 5.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 123
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 153 vs 122
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 30 September 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 5.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 vs 122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G92 | NV48 |
Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 30 September 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1275 | 1278 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1463 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 562 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 5.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-IV | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory clock speed | 532 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |