NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M vs ATI Radeon X1600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M and ATI Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 635 MHz
- 15x more texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 2.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 11.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 576 vs 49
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1876 vs 1019
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1876 vs 1019
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 vs 1 January 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 635 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 2.54 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 vs 49 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 vs 1019 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 153
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 27 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 153 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | ATI Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 576 | 49 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 153 | 209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1876 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1876 | 1019 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | ATI Radeon X1600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
| Code name | G92 | RV516 |
| Launch date | 3 March 2009 | 1 January 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1275 | 1277 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1463 MHz | 635 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | |
| Gigaflops | 562 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec | 2.54 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 27 Watt |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-IV | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 61 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
| SLI | ||
