NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 374.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1097 vs 576
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 153
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1876
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1876
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 3 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops vs 374.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 vs 576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 vs 153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1876 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1463 MHz vs 837 MHz
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 26.78 GTexel / s
| Core clock speed | 1463 MHz vs 837 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 26.78 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1097 | 576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 153 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 1876 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 1876 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 3 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1273 | 1275 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 1463 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 374.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.78 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Gigaflops | 562 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-IV |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| HybridPower | ||
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| PureVideo HD | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800M GTS
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 280M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7400G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
