NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 130 nm
- 35.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1206 vs 34
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 17 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 vs 34 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 103
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 | 34 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Rage 8 |
Code name | GT200B | RC410 |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 17 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Place in performance rating | 927 | 928 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 300 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 2x 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |