NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and NVIDIA GeForce 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 14.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1206 vs 82
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 795
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 795
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 17 April 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 vs 82 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 vs 795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 vs 795 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9100
- 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 289 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 289 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 | 82 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 | 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 795 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 795 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | C78 |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 17 April 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Place in performance rating | 927 | 929 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 2x 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |