NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 289 Watt
  • Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1792 MB
  • Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 999 MHz
  • Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2074 vs 1206
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 vs 103
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3626 vs 3443
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3318 vs 3107
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3626 vs 3443
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3318 vs 3107
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 June 2011 vs 8 January 2009
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 289 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1792 MB
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz vs 999 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2074 vs 1206
PassMark - G2D Mark 349 vs 103
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3626 vs 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3318 vs 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3626 vs 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3318 vs 3107

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 620 MHz
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 39.7 billion / sec
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 2x 240 vs 384
  • Around 25% better floating-point performance: 2x 596.2 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21048 vs 6389
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1242 MHz vs 620 MHz
Texture fill rate 92.2 billion / sec vs 39.7 billion / sec
Pipelines 2x 240 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2x 596.2 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 21048 vs 6389

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2074
1206
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
349
103
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6389
21048
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3626
3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3318
3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3626
3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3318
3107
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
PassMark - G3D Mark 2074 1206
PassMark - G2D Mark 349 103
Geekbench - OpenCL 6389 21048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 690.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.83
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.702
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3626 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3318 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3626 3443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3318 3107

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name GF114 GT200B
Launch date 28 June 2011 8 January 2009
Place in performance rating 926 927
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $500
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.53

Technical info

Core clock speed 620 MHz 1242 MHz
CUDA cores 384 480
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops 2x 596.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 384 2x 240
Texture fill rate 39.7 billion / sec 92.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 289 Watt
Transistor count 1,950 million 1,400 million
CUDA cores per GPU 240
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way Quad
Supplementary power connectors None 6-pin & 8-pin
Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1792 MB
Memory bandwidth 96.0 GB / s 223.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 896 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz 999 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory interface width per GPU 448 Bit
Standard memory config per GPU 896 MB

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) 128bit