NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 440 MHz
- 4x more texture fill rate: 42 billion / sec vs 10.56 GTexel / s
- 20x more pipelines: 480 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 1100 MHz
- 19.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 210
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 239
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3320 vs 575
- 5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3320 vs 575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 March 2010 vs 29 September 2005 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 440 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 42 billion / sec vs 10.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 vs 575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 vs 575 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 | 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13143 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 | 575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 | 575 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
Code name | GF100 | G70 |
Launch date | 26 March 2010 | 29 September 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 742 | 1228 |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 440 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 480 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 42 billion / sec | 10.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 302 million |
Boost clock speed | 440 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 550 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |