NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec
- 2x more pipelines: 960 vs 480
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 430
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 30.405
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3320
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3320
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 26 March 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 430 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 30.405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 308x more memory clock speed: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 4017
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13143 vs 11364
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.483 vs 30.505
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 3.085
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 62.69
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 3581
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 3581
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 4017 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13143 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 vs 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 3581 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 4121 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 430 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 13143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 34.483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 706.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 4.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 30.405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 106.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3320 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 5110 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3658 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3320 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK106 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 26 March 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 740 | 742 |
| Price now | $349.99 | $71.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | 61.35 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 700 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 42 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |

