NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 360 MHz
- 14.2x more texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s
- 28x more pipelines: 448 vs 16
- 56.9x better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 23.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 3800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 628
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 628
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 November 2011 vs 12 September 2007 |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 360 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s vs 2.88 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 23.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 628 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 210 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 628 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 84 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF110 | G84 |
Launch date | 29 November 2011 | 12 September 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | $129 |
Place in performance rating | 856 | 858 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $92.75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 360 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops | 23.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s | 2.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 198 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |