NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 33.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 1 GB
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.324 vs 12.318
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 748.068
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 1.234
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 28.768
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 3127
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 3127

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790

• Around 15% higher core clock speed: 840 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 79% higher pipelines: 800 vs 448
• Around 2% better floating-point performance: 1,344.0 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 210 Watt
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 3800 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3333
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 vs 2133
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3333

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.324 12.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1181.463 748.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.978 1.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.37 28.768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.575 121.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4590 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2133 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4590 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2133 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3333 3350

Compare specifications (specs)