NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2

NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
50.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
48x more pipelines: 2x 384 vs 16
53.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,305.6 gflops vs 48.96 gflops

Launch date	25 January 2011 vs 10 January 2010
Texture fill rate	2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 384 vs 16
Floating-point performance	2x 1,305.6 gflops vs 48.96 gflops

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 850 MHz
12.1x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 170 Watt

Core clock speed	1530 MHz vs 850 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	14 Watt vs 170 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2	NVIDIA GeForce 310M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.3
PassMark - G3D Mark		121
PassMark - G2D Mark		22
Geekbench - OpenCL		2949
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1167

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2	NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF114	GT218
Launch date	25 January 2011	10 January 2010
Place in performance rating	1660	1673
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1530 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 1,305.6 gflops	48.96 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	2x 384	16
Texture fill rate	2x 54.4 GTexel / s billion / sec	5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	170 Watt	14 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	260 million
CUDA cores		16
Gigaflops		73
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	292 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 1 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 128.3 GB / s	12.64 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3, DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
HybridPower
Power management		8.0