NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 11x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 13.2x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 13x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3063 vs 236
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 429
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 vs 30 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 vs 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 558 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF114 | RV710 |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 | 30 September 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | $59 |
Place in performance rating | 799 | 800 |
Price now | $138 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |