AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
• Around 70% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 31.935
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 539.966
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 2.344
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 35.841
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 64.308
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4184
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4184
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 2344
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 2344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 64.308
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333

Compare specifications (specs)