NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 601 MHz
- 7.3x more texture fill rate: 52.7 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- 4.4x better floating-point performance: 1,263.4 gflops vs 288.48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 10.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3063 vs 292
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 344
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2648
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2648
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 vs 6 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 601 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s vs 7.21 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops vs 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 vs 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 2648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 2648 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3063 | 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 | 344 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10721 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.935 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 539.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.841 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.308 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 2648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 2648 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 389 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF114 | R600 |
Launch date | 25 January 2011 | 6 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 799 | 801 |
Price now | $138 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | 288.48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 52.7 GTexel / s | 7.21 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 720 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |