NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and NVIDIA Tesla K10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
Launch date | 22 April 2013 vs 1 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- 7.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.55 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 576
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 949.2 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 5238
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 13.806
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 546.51
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.535
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 3531
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3300
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 3531
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3300
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 39.55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 576 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 949.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 vs 5238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 vs 13.806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 vs 546.51 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 vs 1.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 vs 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 vs 3531 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K10
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K10 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1882 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5238 | 14029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.806 | 40.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 546.51 | 975.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.535 | 3.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.524 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3531 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3300 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3531 | 3632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3300 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
Launch date | 22 April 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 976 | 978 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,099 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 949.2 gflops | 2x 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 576 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 39.55 GTexel / s | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 147 mm | 272 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |