NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM vs AMD FirePro V4900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM and AMD FirePro V4900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 800 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 576 vs 480
• Around 24% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1887 vs 990
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 312
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5207 vs 1928
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.806 vs 6.303
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 392.237
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.535 vs 0.597
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.524 vs 17.874

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V4900

• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 72.818 vs 38.664
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1747 vs 1435
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3753 vs 3531
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7745 vs 3300
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1747 vs 1435
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3753 vs 3531
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7745 vs 3300

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V4900

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1887 990
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	429 312
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5207 1928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.806 6.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.51 392.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.535 0.597
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.524 17.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.664 72.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 7745
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1435 1747
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3531 3753
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3300 7745

Compare specifications (specs)