NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and ATI Radeon X1600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 26.6x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 2.36 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 28.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3335 vs 116
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 356
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 1745
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 1 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 2.36 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3335 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 XT
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 42 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 230x more memory clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 42 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon X1600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3335 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | 1745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | R500 |
Code name | GK106 | RV530 |
Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 1 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 836 | 826 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 590 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 2.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | 42 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 22.08 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |