NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
• Around 10% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,856.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 151 Watt
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.718 vs 14.134
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 676.409
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.143 vs 1.309
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 56.509 vs 36.678
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 2996
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

• Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.25 vs 67.697
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3665
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3665
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3325

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.718 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1021.371 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.143 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.509 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.697 171.25
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5983 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3665 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5983 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3665 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3325 3354

Compare specifications (specs)