NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1344 vs 480
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4423 vs 4116
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 438
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15347 vs 13144
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 34.483
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 706.104
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 30.405
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3320
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4423 vs 4116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 vs 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15347 vs 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 vs 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 308x more memory clock speed: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 3.037
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 82.191
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 3285
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4423 | 4116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15347 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | 30.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | 106.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 26 March 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 747 | 749 |
Price now | $321.99 | $71.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | 61.35 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
SLI options | 3-way | 2-way, 3-way |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |