NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 102.5 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1344
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 866.7x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16664 vs 15347
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 36.256
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 1029.267
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 3.037
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 45.894
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 82.191
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3337
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 235 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 198
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1032
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1032

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4403 4423
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	198 466
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16664 15347
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.455 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1666.354 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.836 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	92.472 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	275.229 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1032 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 3337

Compare specifications (specs)