NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 462
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 versus 930.114
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 29.836
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1849
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1673
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1849
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1673
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 August 2012 versus 3 May 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 versus 930.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 29.836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1673 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1019 MHz versus 980 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 234 billion / sec versus 102.5 billion / sec
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1344
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 3,130 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 versus 2 GB
- 1001.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5516 versus 4422
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16608 versus 15315
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 versus 36.256
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 versus 3.037
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 versus 82.191
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 versus 3285
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 versus 3285
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1019 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 234 billion / sec versus 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1344 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,130 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5516 versus 4422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16608 versus 15315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 versus 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 versus 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 versus 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 versus 3285 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4422 | 5516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15315 | 16608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | 46.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | 930.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | 3.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | 29.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | 97.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1673 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 16 August 2012 | 3 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 745 | 746 |
Prix maintenant | $321.99 | $999 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.34 | 7.01 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 915 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | 3072 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | 2x 3,130 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 2x 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec | 234 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 11.0" (27.9 cm) |
Options SLI | 3-way | Quad |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 384 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |