NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs Intel HD Graphics 2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and Intel HD Graphics 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 160x more pipelines: 960 vs 6
- 194.2x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 10.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 18.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3998 vs 213
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 456
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 1039
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 1039
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 5 January 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3998 vs 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 vs 456 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2000
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 10.8x more texture fill rate: 850 MTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 850 MTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3998 | 213 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 478 | 456 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 1039 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 1039 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 6.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | Sandy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 5 January 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Place in performance rating | 772 | 687 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 10.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 850 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 590
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
