NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 960
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 11364
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 30.505
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 vs 705.293
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.085
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 vs 35.416
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 vs 62.69
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 vs 1307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 960 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 vs 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 vs 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 vs 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 vs 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 vs 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 vs 1307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 3814
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 330
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 954 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 vs 3814 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 737 | 740 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | 960 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||

