NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 960
- Around 54% better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 11368
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 30.505
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 vs 705.293
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.085
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 vs 35.416
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 vs 62.69
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3690
- Around 23% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 vs 1307
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 6 September 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 11368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 vs 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 vs 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 vs 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 vs 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 vs 1307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4005 vs 3818
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 333
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4005 vs 3818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | 4005 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 480 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 11368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 62.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3365 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 774 | 776 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 980 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | 960 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync |