NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 46% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz
• 20x more pipelines: 960 vs 48
• 15.4x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 vs 292
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 113
• 8.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 vs 1396
• 11.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 2.747
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 104.498
• 11.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 0.27
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 5.832
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 vs 9.69
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 664
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 1602
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 2848
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 664
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 1602
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 2848

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• 11.7x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 140 Watt
• 266.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4017 292
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	487 113
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11364 1396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.505 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	705.293 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.085 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.416 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.69 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3581 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3365 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3581 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3690 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3365 2848

Compare specifications (specs)