NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 versus NVIDIA GeForce 610M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 672 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1033 MHz versus 900 MHz
- 20x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 48
- 15.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,981 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 13.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 292
- 4.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 113
- 8.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 1396
- 11.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 2.747
- 6.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 104.498
- 11.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 0.27
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 5.832
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 62.69 versus 9.69
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 664
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 versus 1602
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 versus 2848
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 664
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 versus 1602
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 versus 2848
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 September 2012 versus 1 December 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 672 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Pipelines | 960 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops versus 129.02 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 1396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 2.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 104.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 0.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 5.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 versus 9.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 versus 1602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 2848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 versus 1602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 2848 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 610M
- 11.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 266.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce 610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 | 292 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 113 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 | 1396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 2.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 104.498 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 0.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 5.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | 9.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 1602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 2848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 1602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 2848 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | NVIDIA GeForce 610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Nom de code | GK106 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 6 September 2012 | 1 December 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 740 | 1535 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 672 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 960 | 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | 129.02 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 12 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 585 million |
Décodeurs de vidéo | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | 64bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Optimus |