NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 950 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 30.4 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
- 21.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 729.6 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 versus 8.712
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 versus 155.638
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 versus 7.36
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 versus 12.009
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 versus 754
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 versus 1492
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 16 |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 versus 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 versus 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 versus 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 versus 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 versus 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.931 versus 0.785
- 24.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 versus 31.3
- 34.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 43.4
- 26.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 91.5
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 versus 0.785 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 versus 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 versus 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 91.5 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 | 8.712 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 | 155.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 | 0.931 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 | 12.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31.3 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 43.4 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 91.5 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 345 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 191 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 540 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 14 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1497 | 1499 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,200 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
