NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 86% higher core clock speed: 835 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 2.8x more texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 10.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1438 vs 238
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 266 vs 111

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1438 238
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	266 111

Compare specifications (specs)