NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 vs ATI Radeon E2400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 42.7x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
• 33.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 40
• 51.2x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 48 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
• 102.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5331 vs 52
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 vs 287

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400

• 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 170 Watt
• 233.3x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5331 52
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	529 287

Compare specifications (specs)