NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 598 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 26.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1746 vs 66
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1746 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1746 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF114 | RS880 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 1 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 979 | 982 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 380 MHz |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1526 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
SLI |